September 23, 2010 by Alicia Kelso — Editor, QSRWeb.com
So many chains have been the focal point of foodborne illness outbreaks. This summer seemed particularly chaotic, with salmonella cases traced to Taco Bell and Subway; massive recalls of eggs, juice and dairy products; and even a recall of McDonald’s Shrek-themed glasses.
And while the business model of massive chains seems to make food safety policing a little tricky, it doesn’t need to be. According to Donna Duberg, a member of the Tork Green Hygiene Council and assistant professor in Clinical Laboratory Science at Saint Louis University, food safety always comes back to the basics.
“My goal is to prevent people from getting sick, and there are basic things that people just aren’t doing. We need to get back into those habits, especially when it comes to the foodservice industry, where exposure reaches so many people that it can become devastating,” Duberg said.
Although it seems there has been more media exposure regarding large-scale foodborne illnesses as of late, Duberg said the caseload has been consistent throughout the years. However, the increased gravitation toward a monoculture system has presented a concern. Agricultural monoculture is the practice of cultivating a single crop for commercialization.
“The monoculture in this country – and around the world – where there are enormous farms or poultry farms, and there is an enormous number of products coming out of a few areas has really changed things. When bacteria get into that supply, into that large of a system, it’s virtually impossible to get it out,” Duberg said.
Products derived from these farms are also processed in enormous warehouses before being transferred in massive quantities, compounding the issue. Other factors that contribute to dangerous conditions are widespread misconceptions about refrigeration and unhygienic transport vessels.
“Bacteria slows in refrigerated conditions, but it is not killed, which is what too many people think. When products are being transported in refrigeration, from the warehouses to the trucks to the chains, bacteria is still multiplying. Also, we’re simply not cleaning our transport vessels. Those truck crates are not clean, so they could be adding something from a previous batch or farm,” Duberg said.
A remedy for these issues would be an increased adoption of obtaining products from local sources and smaller farms.
“A big suggestion to have safer food is to buy locally, organically. Doing so reduces the potential for an outbreak and reduces widespread distribution of contaminated products. It not only keeps it contained, it is easier to come up with a resolution if something does happen,” Duberg said. “The hope is that by eating locally, we’ll reduce the possibility of pathogenic bacteria.”
Switching to local vendors may be costlier, but reducing the risk of foodborne illnesses trumps such a concern.
“What’s the alternative? Not only is there a health concern, but people aren’t going to trust your facility, your brand, if something happens. It’s worth raising prices by a small amount to buy locally,” Duberg said.
Duberg has many other tips for foodservice employees, from the basics to more calculated efforts. They include the following:
Although many of these tips seem simple on paper, pathogenic bacteria is constantly present, so the smallest oversight can result in drastic consequences. Thirty-two percent of all food poisoning incidents are due to poor hygiene; and 5,000 deaths occur each year from foodborne illnesses.
“There still needs to be a lot of education done because people still neglect to follow the basics,” Duberg said. “At the management level, the focus needs to be on guidelines, training and awareness. But when it comes down to it, we’re all responsible for keeping our food safe.”